Online Public Shaming, the Duties of Social Media Platforms, and the Case for Regulation

Profile image of Paul Billingham
Wednesday, 5th March @ 12:30pm

Abstract: Online public shaming—the practice of using the Internet to criticise perceived moral transgressions and transgressors—is commonplace. And much of it is wrongful. Its targets often suffer disproportionate harms and face abuse, doxing, and other forms of impermissible treatment. One question this raises is what should be done in response to the prevalence of wrongful public shaming online. This paper offers one part of an answer to this question. It argues that there is a compelling case for social media platforms themselves to be active in tackling wrongful online public shaming, as well as for government regulation of these platforms to stimulate such activity. The paper makes a positive case for this claim and responds to several objections.

About the presenter: Paul Billingham is an Associate Professor of Political Theory in the Department for Politics and International Relations at the University of Oxford. His research interests include democratic deliberation and legitimacy, religion and politics, and the morality of public shaming, especially shaming carried out online. His work has been published in numerous book chapters and articles in journals of moral, legal, and political philosophy.